Art in Court

Gilberto Valle

Credit: http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-canada-21706648

The recent headline-grabbing case about the NYC “Cannibal Cop” caught my eye for more than just the obvious reasons. While reading an online article about the case, I was almost moved to a feeling of sympathy for the defendant based on a courtroom sketch. In the sketch, Gilberto Valle is portrayed with his eyes shut and forehead resting fatalistically on his hand as his wife testifies against him. [Credit  http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-canada-21706648. I'd love to know who the artist is - courtroom sketch artists don't seem to get much glory!] Disregarding the gory subject matter, the sketch is stunning: it captures the essence of a man who knows his goose is cooked.

The sketch got me thinking, though – why, in this day and age where everyone has a camera on their cell phone, would anyone bother with the laborious process of drawing a moment of the proceedings?

Most of the time courtroom sketches are done in the U.S. when, for whatever reason, cameras are not allowed in the courtroom. Federal courts are particularly restrictive in this area. The U.S. Supreme Court is the best example of a forum where cameras are banned, making sketches the only source of visuals for proceedings.

Supreme Court proceedings also seem to yield the most interesting sketches. I came across the website www.courtartist.com, featuring the works of artist Arthur Lien, where you can find expressive, full-color portrayals of proceedings in the Supreme Court as well as various courts of appeal. You can purchase sketches from famous trials such as Bush v. Gore and even the recent Prop. 8 arguments. Out of respect for his copyrights and the fact he’s trying to make a living off this work, I won’t post anything here, but you should check them out.

800px-Witchcraft_at_Salem_Village

Courtroom sketch from Salem witch trials.

One of my favorite sketches, though, comes from back in a day when sketching was the only way to portray what was happening in the courtroom. This sketch was from a witchcraft trial in 1876. The scene looks more like a religious revival than what we see in court today (which in some ways, I guess it was!).

Given the varying quality of the courtroom sketches I’ve seen, I’m not sure I ever want to be portrayed in one, but I hope the art isn’t rendered obsolete by technology. There’s definitely a timeless quality to the sketches that somehow elevates the proceedings they’re portraying.

Born Trifecta

Listening on C-SPAN to the rallies and protests which took place before SCOTUS opened its doors to hear Hollingsworth v. Perry (the Prop 8 case), I was struck by many things, said by many people. My eyes welled up as gay couples and children of gay couples rose and spoke to constructs of love, family, and equality. Constructs beginning as empty vessels – to ultimately stock one’s own individualized belongings. I felt deceived to fund a military that operates so unjustly due to DOMA’s ramifications, to rediscover that our government treats some of its citizens as strangers in their own lands. I felt shock. The same intensity as that of so many times before when reminded of the opponents’ rationale. Neither the magnitude of such shock nor the resolve exhibited in their refusal to retreat can be articulated in words. Gall, vitriol? The voice I internalized, however … the voice most striking, was that of an African-American lesbian pastor. Hers was that of a woman, black, and gay. This individual: born to be, yet rejected to become. Suffrage, slavery, marriage. What it must be like to forever seek freedom from another – and even worse in a country founded on principles believed to actually safeguard against this very travesty. The effects and tolls this must take on one’s psyche. The hushed voices and sometimes not so hushed actions. Empathy falls short and yet true understanding is an impossible ideal. Each of us, throughout our lives, struggles with our own personal stations, be it financial, emotional or some other combination of shared humanity. Though hers and numerous others’ struggle is simply to share in humanity, to be allowed. A rite of allowance in a country scripted in acceptance – the ultimate contradiction. This is wrong. And in this century, in this country, it is high time to be right. When this woman spoke, I did not hear what I shouldn’t take for granted; instead, I listened to what it must be like.

Orange you excited for your fresh start? Bankruptcy planning, keep your tax refund.

transparent orange

There is bankruptcy and there is bankruptcy planning. The latter is crucial in avoiding unpleasant surprises when you are in a pinch for dough. Let’s face it, most folks who never imagined they’d file do so because times are tough, real tough. Whether it be medical bills, credit card debt, or mortgage deficiency amounts owed from a foreclosure or ill-advised short sale, you are left with the same empty pocket and creditor calls ad nauseam. The LAST thing you want to hear is that the Trustee assigned to your case is snatching the one thing that you’ve been secretly counting on, your ace in the hole: your tax refund.

Preparing taxes is the pits, no doubt; but for some of us, the silver lining is that Uncle Sam returns that portion of your withholdings held in excess, alternatively referred to as your “refund,”or even more alternatively termed “a reimbursement.” “Reimbursement” is defined as the act of giving back money. To be clear, this money was yours to begin with. What you’ve been doing with it for the past year is extending an interest-free loan to the MAN.

Another example of this “too kind of you but not to you” behavior is when you choose to escrow your taxes and insurance when making your mortgage payment. Now, don’t get me wrong, some of us are required to escrow for various reasons having to do with our borrower-worthiness; however, if you can opt out of escrow, do so! Banks typically charge a fee to opt-out which translates to either a slightly higher interest rate to you or perhaps a one-time payment. The reason banks charge you this is that your escrow opt-out means less money for them. So opt-out ASAP: you win, they lose.

In both examples, whether it be the Feds or the Banks, you become the investor of your monies for yourself rather than forking over your hard-earned funds as an interest-free loan so they can then invest it and squander the returns. The ease associated with convenience drives many aspects of our lives, but giving the government and financial institutions interest-free loans should be eliminated from your repertoire immediately. Go at it the hard(er) way, be involved, and reap the rewards for yourself.

I digress.

Proper bankruptcy planning can ensure that you – not the Trustee (your creditors) – receive your tax refund. I will try to explain this as simply as possible without gratuitous legal jargon, sparing you the headache and a worthless post. If you have ample time before you are planning to file, the best thing to do is adjust your withholdings through your employer so that you receive a minimal refund. In other words, you will receive more in every paycheck and squirrel away less with the government. As I wrote above, this is best practice so that you get your money sooner in your own hot hand and invest it now! Make your money work for you, not the Government. Compounding interest, time is money . . . you get the point. As a caveat here, we all want more money now, but the key is what you do with the more money now. Save it, invest it, do something smart that 10 years from now will make you proud then  of what you did now. Got it? Good.

A nominal refund makes it is less likely that the Trustee keeps it. It’s a win-win for you. You’ll receive more money throughout the year and the Trustee gets zip.

Now, if you are thinking of filing bankruptcy in the months of November, December, January, February, March, up until April 15, your best bet is: first, file your taxes; second, get your refund; and then, third, file bankruptcy. In the later months of the previous year, time is not on your side, so it makes little impact to adjust your withholdings at this stage of the game. (Although for the reasons already mentioned this is still the wise thing to do, for bankruptcy purposes you’re too late).

The tax year is what’s important (January-December). So, best practice is to wait to file bankruptcy until after you’ve received your refund and spent it appropriately. “Appropriately” means that if you do decide to delay your bankruptcy, it is usually best to spend your tax refund on living expenses and other necessities such as rent or food. You can also use it to pay your bankruptcy attorney. However, if you purchase other assets with your refund, then you must disclose them in your bankruptcy and you therefore risk losing them unless they are exempt. What I advise clients in determining appropriateness is that they consider whether the purchase or expense is a want or a need? 60 inch flat screen v. new car providing reliable transportation? Courts and Trustees are somewhat flexible in these determinations. For instance, I am always comfortable arguing that a vacation is both a want and a need, and is thus appropriate.

Bankruptcy trustees are particularly concerned with your assets. The name of the game in bankruptcy is whether an asset is exempt or non-exempt. You want exempt assets. Non-exempt assets are losers, and you may be required to turn them  over to the Trustee, who then distributes them accordingly to your creditors. When it comes to tax refunds, beginning January 1 of any given current year, any refund coming to you from last year’s tax return filed becomes this year’s  asset. Remember also that a received but unspent refund is treated as cash, and cash is non-exempt (i.e., a loser) and is open game to a trustee’s reach.

In sum, it is always preferable for you to keep your money rather than hand it over to the government or big banks. Along these lines, in a bankruptcy, you need to preserve what you can for you. If you are facing bankruptcy, your financial house’s foundation is probably shaky and oftentimes you are purely in survival mode. You may feel as if you are in an episode of Survivor, except that it’s real life and you’re the only contestant. Do not fret, you will beat this chapter in your life and come out better for it. Just don’t lose pieces along the way that are rightfully yours so long as planned for properly. Bottom line with refunds and bankruptcy is that the best strategy might be to delay. Hang on, deal with the incessant collector calls just a little while longer and keep reminding yourself that this is what’s best for you – be selfish!

In no way should this blog post be construed as my advocating that bankruptcy be handled in an unethical, improper or illegal manner; only that you squeeze the most juice from your fresh start orange and turn the page on more firm financial footing!

2013 Changes to Colorado’s Real Estate Contracts

http://www.dreamstime.com/-image27792172Every year the Colorado Department of Regulatory Agencies Division of Real Estate evaluates the standard real estate forms used by real estate brokers for the purchase and sale of residential property. As of January 1, 2013, there are some big changes to the forms which, if you’re a broker or considering selling or buying without representation, you should definitely know about and understand.

These forms are mandatory for real estate brokers/Realtors. The good news for people who aren’t working with a broker is that they can also use the forms. They’re a good place to start if you’re completely clueless about the process, but beware . . . you’d better understand them inside and out before you start signing anything.

Here’s a summary of the more significant changes to the contracts this year:

-Choosing a Title Company: In the past, it’s been unclear under the Contract to Buy/Sell Real Estate who gets to choose the title company handling the transaction. Now, in section 7 there is an opportunity to specify whether the buyer or seller will be making the choice. If no choice is specified, the default will be the typical situation where the seller selects and pays for the title company service.

-Owner’s Extended Coverage (OEC): There is now a separate section in the Contract regarding OEC, and it gives a little more description of what OEC entails. There’s a clear disclaimer, too, that even if the parties contract to purchase OEC, the title company might still refuse to provide it – this is definitely something that happens every now and then.

-Off-Record Title: Finally some clarification in section 8.2 about the procedure for disclosing off-record title matters. If only they’d give more guidance on the due diligence docs now!

-Conditional Sale Deadline: Few things cause sellers more anxiety than an offer that is contingent upon the sale of the buyer’s current home. Section 10.8 now takes away a bit of the pressure on brokers and sellers by setting a formal date by which the contingent sale must take place.

-Damage to Inclusions Before Closing: Section 19.2 now outlines what happens in the event that there is harm to the property prior to closing. There’s also a sly reference to the availability of pre-owned home warranty programs that may cover replacements or repairs . . . although the quality of these warranty programs vary, I think it’s an interesting additional point to throw into the purchase negotiations.

-Clarification Regarding the Significance of the Inspection Resolution: The inspection resolution now makes clear that it is an amendment to the Contract. As such, failure to provide it to the lender or any other party who needs to know about amendments to the Contract is a big no-no. Although this shouldn’t be a surprise to a diligent broker, I’ve encountered plenty of people who try to slip this past the lender. That was wrong before this change to the resolution, and now ignorance is no excuse.

-New “Green Disclosure” Form: If a property has special “green” features, this is the seller’s opportunity to discuss and disclose them. My recommendation is that if a property does have any of these features, fill the form out prior to putting the property on the MLS and use it in marketing materials.

There are numerous other small changes to the forms. Do your homework, and if in doubt, work with an attorney or broker to better understand everything you’re signing.

The current real estate forms can be found here.

New year, new perspective

The other day I ate at Jimmy John’s and noticed this story posted on their wall. I thought it quite appropriate for a new year, new perspective. Enjoy!

The Parable of The Mexican Fisherman And The Banker

An American investment banker was taking a much-needed vacation in a small coastal Mexican village when a small boat with just one fisherman docked. The boat had several large, fresh fish in it.

The investment banker was impressed by the quality of the fish and asked the Mexican how long it took to catch them. The Mexican replied, “Only a little while.” The banker then asked why he didn’t stay out longer and catch more fish?

The Mexican fisherman replied he had enough to support his family’s immediate needs.

The American then asked “But what do you do with the rest of your time?”

The Mexican fisherman replied, “I sleep late, fish a little, play with my children, take siesta with my wife, stroll into the village each evening where I sip wine and play guitar with my amigos: I have a full and busy life, senor.”

The investment banker scoffed, “I am an Ivy League MBA, and I could help you. You could spend more time fishing and with the proceeds buy a bigger boat, and with the proceeds from the bigger boat you could buy several boats until eventually you would have a whole fleet of fishing boats. Instead of selling your catch to the middleman you could sell directly to the processor, eventually opening your own cannery. You could control the product, processing and distribution.”

Then he added, “Of course, you would need to leave this small coastal fishing village and move to Mexico City where you would run your growing enterprise.”

The Mexican fisherman asked, “But senor, how long will this all take?”

To which the American replied, “15-20 years.”

“But what then?” asked the Mexican.

The American laughed and said, “That’s the best part. When the time is right you would announce an IPO and sell your company stock to the public and become very rich. You could make millions.”

“Millions, senor? Then what?”

To which the investment banker replied, “Then you would retire. You could move to a small coastal fishing village where you would sleep late, fish a little, play with your kids, take siesta with your wife, stroll to the village in the evenings where you could sip wine and play your guitar with your amigos.”

Colorado Medical Advance Directives

It’s obvious: no one likes to think about what would happen if one day they couldn’t make medical decisions for themselves. But stuff happens. Every adult needs to face this reality and do what they can to make what would be a miserable situation easier on their family – and, ultimately, themselves. One way to accomplish this is to have drafted a Medical Advance Directive – a set of instructions for healthcare providers and family members in the event you’re not able to make decisions about your health yourself.

There are many terms used for the different types of Medical Advance Directives: living wills, directives, durable power of attorney, patient advocacy, etc. It’s confusing, and the terms are frequently used interchangeably. However, Colorado has four main types of these medical care directives, and each serves a different purpose:

Proxy Decision-Makers for Medical Treatment. In the event that an incapacitated person has not drafted any medical advance directives, the Proxy Decision-Makers for Medical Treatment statute is triggered. Once a physician or court makes the determination that a person is incapable of making medical decisions, an attempt is made to notify the person’s spouse, parent, adult child(ren), adult sibling(s), adult grandchild(ren), and any adult close friend. After reasonable attempts at notice, the family and interested persons must come to a consensus about who will be the proxy decision maker. If family and friends can’t agree, then any interested person may petition a court for guardianship of the incapacitated person. Whoever is appointed will have the power to make decisions as to artificial nutrition, hydration, and medical treatment.

This process can be messy and complicated . . . how many of us have family and friends who could agree on something so important in a very stressful time? But, this process is the Colorado default, so if you don’t like how things would work out under the statute, it’s all the more reason to contact an attorney to draft one of the following Medical Advance Directives for you.

CPR Directive. This is a document that informs medical personnel that you do not want to have CPR (cardiopulmonary resuscitation) performed. CPR Directives are usually drawn up by already-ill individuals, and kept on file at a nursing home or hospice. Otherwise, they’re a bit tricky to follow – if someone has a heart attack in the middle of the street, a rescuer’s first reaction will be to attempt CPR, not to look in their pockets to see if they have a CPR Directive. If there isn’t a CPR Directive readily available, the law presumes that one does not exist. If you go this route, make sure your primary care physician has a copy, any home/hospice care provider has a copy, and that any close relatives or friends have a copy or know how to get one in a hurry.

Living Will. A living will is a declaration of what medical or surgical treatment a person wants withheld or withdrawn if he or she is terminally ill and is either unconscious or incompetent to make decisions about medical procedures. A living will must be drawn up while the person is still competent to make decisions about medical care. If the person desires that artificial nutrition not be given, the living will must state this explicitly. A living will also has strict procedures regarding how it must be signed and notarized. Once a physician signs a certificate of terminal condition for the patient, family or interested parties still have 48 hours to challenge the validity of the living will, at which point a court will intervene and rule on validity of the living will. If there is no reason to find that the living will is invalid, a court will often grant the declarant’s desires. A living will can be revoked at any time while the person is still competent to make decisions. It’s best to make the existence of a living will known to close relatives, as well as your primary care physician, and to tell any surgeon or doctor you go to for a procedure that you have a living will in place and how to get a hold of it. Don’t put documents like this in a safe deposit box – put them somewhere that can be easily accessed by people other than yourself.

Medical Durable Power of Attorney. This is also often referred to as a medical power of attorney or just a “POA,” but should not be confused with other forms of power of attorney that can be given. The Medical Durable Power of Attorney (MDPA) is a document you would draw up if you want to give another person the authority to act as your agent and make medical treatment decisions for you when you are unable. The authority and power given can be as limited or as extensive as desired. It is important that the appointed agent is aware of any religious or moral issues that the incapacitated person may want addressed in the course of their care, and the MDPA is often drafted at the same time as a living will to reinforce these concerns. A court can also remove an agent under an MDPA if the agent decides he or she does not want to act in that capacity, so if you’re considering granting a MDPA to someone it’s recommended that you discuss your intent with them and make sure they are on board to act as your agent in the event it was needed. Give that person a copy of it, and make the location of copies known to friends and family. Your lawyer can also keep a copy on file, although he or she will need permission to release it to anyone.

Under Colorado law, you are also able to designate if you wish to be an organ donor. Many people have indicated on their Colorado license plates their donor status, but integrating a clause about organ donation into these Medical Advance Directives can allow you to be more specific about your donation wishes (or desire to not donate).

We can help you get any of these Colorado Medical Advance Directives in place: living wills, CPR Directives, or Medical Durable Power of Attorney.

Handwritten signs of gratitude remain the most touching.

Client Testimonial

Client Testimonial

Client Testimonial
Client Testimonial

Client Testimonial
Client Testimonial

Goodbyes matter

You’ve just had an excellent conversation with a prospective or current client. The energy was great and you feel as if you addressed all asked inquiries. In sum, things could not have gone better, you nailed it … then, the hang up. Your goodbye is muffled, it lacks personality. It comes across as rushed, maybe even delivered at a level entirely unlike what came before. How you get off the phone with someone is crucial. It cannot be emphasized enough. It is the close. It is the final word. It is the lasting impression.

The inspiration behind this post stems from a recent engagement. It was an informative sales call – I was the prospect. I was on the fence about this particular product/service, I had questions and concerns which needed resolve. This call would be his opportunity to count me as a customer.

The salesman was spectacular. He was cordial, he knew what he was selling, and he was a phenomenal listener (which by the way is what ultimately sells). However, he risked aborting all stock he had established with me by simply neglecting his follow-through.

Are home runs hit with check swings? Rarely. Do drives fly 350 yards without that big stick landing behind a shoulder? Nope. When time came for goodbye, his voice trailed off and he hung up abruptly. It was as if throughout our entire conversation, he was actually only biding time to attend to something more important. It came across like he could not bear even one more second on the phone with me. I felt like a sucker for not being keen to it  earlier. Furthermore, I felt like a nuisance for keeping him so long. It left me disillusioned. Like when you see an awesome magic trick, and wonder aloud, how in the world did you just do that?! Except this was in a bad way. All that rapport – flushed like last night’s dinner.

Why leave clients second-guessing a good thing? Go the extra mile to exit gracefully. There’s a reason dining establishments place mint dishes on your way out – it’s pleasant to walk to your car with a good taste in your mouth.

Seems like it should go without saying, but goodbyes matter.

LLCs are a lot like shoes – fit matters!

The Limited Liability Company (LLC) has become a popular business structure in the startup world. Savvy small business owners often opt for this structure over a traditional corporation, as the LLC offers personal liability protection without the red tape, paperwork and formalities that can be burdensome for a young startup, small business or solo entrepreneur.

Many small business owners are surprised to know that there are choices for your LLC. From a single-member LLC to a multiple-member LLC, member-managed LLC to manager-managed LLC, how do you know what’s right for you?


Single Member LLC or Multi-Member LLC


As the names imply, a single member LLC (SLLC) has a single owner, while the multi-member LLC has multiple owners.

For example, John Utah started a consulting business; he’s the sole owner, but plans to hire a few account managers and other employees. In this case, Utah could form an SLLC because income from a single member LLC isn’t divided (as it would be for a partnership or if there were multiple owners of the business) and there are no separate taxes to file with the IRS. The IRS treats an SLLC just like a sole proprietorship. But note that LLCs can also choose to be taxed as a corporation.

Now if Utah decided to launch the business as a joint venture with a colleague, there would be two owners, and they could form a multi-member LLC.


Member Managed LLC or Manager Managed LLC


Once a multi-member LLC is formed, you’ll need to set up your desired structure in the LLC operating agreement: member-managed or manager-managed.

A member-managed LLC is run by the owners of the company. This is the simplest structure and means that every owner has the authority to act on behalf of the business (i.e. take out a business loan, negotiate contracts and handle other financial and operational tasks).

Using J. Utah and his consulting business as an example, let’s say that Utah and his colleague Bodi launched the business. Both plan to be active participants in the business, with Utah handling client relations and Bodi managing the administrative aspects. Since they both will have direct involvement in the business, a member-managed LLC will probably make the most sense for them.

Now let’s say that Utah and Bodi are launching their consulting business but need some financial support to get the business off the ground. A few of their friends and family pitch in and invest in the business. In this case, the manager-managed LLC would probably be optimal.

A manager-managed LLC is typically used when there are passive members in the LLC, such as investors who aren’t actively involved in the business. With a manager-managed LLC, the LLC members elect managers who have the authority to operate the business. In our scenario, Utah, Bodi, investing family and friends are all members of the LLC. Then, the members elect Utah and Bodi to be managing members. Utah and Bodi are responsible for the day-to-day operations, while the non-managing members remove themselves from the direct operations of the business.

In most states, an LLC is member-managed by default. That means that if you don’t specify management structure in the formation documents you file with your state, your LLC most likely is member-managed.


Domestic LLC or Foreign LLC

In this case, domestic or foreign refers to the state where the LLC is created and operates. A company that is registered in Colorado and does business in Colorado is operating as a domestic LLC. If the same company does business in Texas (and has a physical presence there), it is operating as a foreign LLC in Texas.
This situation commonly comes up when an LLC is created in states with business-friendly tax laws but does business in its home state. It can also occur when a business starts expanding into other states. A foreign LLC is required to register with the Secretary of State in the foreign state (as well as meet the regulatory and tax requirements of the foreign state).

Be aware that just having a client or selling to customers in another state doesn’t necessarily mean you’re operating in that state and must register as a foreign LLC for that state. While exact requirements vary state to state, operating in a state generally means:

  • Having a bank account in the state.
  • Selling in the state through some party directly tied to the LLC (a distributor or sales rep).
  • Owning property in the state.
  • Having offices, owning facilities or holding regular meetings in the state.

Contact Stoneman Legal to help determine which LLC is right for you


The LLC structure is a great option for young and small businesses that don’t want to be burdened with excessive paperwork and requirements. Once you understand the different types of LLCs, it should be relatively straightforward to determine which shoe fits you best. As with any legal matter, don’t delay. The sooner you get your business structure squared away, the better.